.

Alpharetta City Center Tree Plans Displease Some Residents

The Mayor opened up an update on the project to public comment, and while some residents didn't like parts of plans, others supported it.

Alpharetta City Council opened up its City Center update to public comment on Monday, Aug. 6, and plenty of local residents had things to say about what trees will be saved in the 22-acre downtown site.

Everyone was in favor of revitalizing downtown with a City Center, but what shape it will take still concerns some residents, with other ready to move forward.

Jean Aldy of Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart, the landscape architectural firm for the project, started the presentation on the tree plan. She said one more specimen tree will be saved with the approved City Center site plan, compared to the concept plan developed in 2011 prior to the $29 million bond referendum vote.

Aldy said while there are 104 trees considered to be specimen trees solely by their size, 23 of them are expecte to be removed because they are in poor health or in a hazardous condition. That leaves 81 trees.

The conceptual plan from 2011 saved 37 specimen trees, while the approved plan saves 38.

"We don't know what's coming down yet," Aldy said.

She said the city will try to save 11 more trees, including at least six crepe myrtles that are specimen trees.

Aldy confirmed for Councilman Chris Owens that a water oak on Academy Street next to the PAL gym is in plans to be saved even though it isn't counted as a specimen tree because it is in poor health.

Not all residents were happy with that number. Some said they felt the city wasn't following the plan that voters approved in the bond referendum. But that was part of the misunderstanding in the first place.

City Administrator Bob Regus said the 2011 concept plan was developed so that City Council knew if its residents supported development of a City Center.

City Attorney Sam Thomas confirmed City Councilman Chris Owens' statement that the bond referendum ballot measure only said the $29 million bond referendum would be used for infrastructure, a new City Hall, development of a park and a parking garage.

When Mayor David Belle Isle opened the meeting up for public comments, Paula Milliard was one of the city residents who thought the plan was getting too dense.

"Really my concern with new plan is that we have so much more retail and mixed use now than we had in the other plan," she said.

Councilman D.C. Aiken said the city doesn't know how much commercial space will be needed. "Is that 125,000 square feet? 110,000? 75,000? 50,000? I don't know. "But what I do know is that our staff is being instructed to tell us what is appropriate."

Most of the update was centered around the trees, and resident variously urged council to save more trees, save as many trees as possible – or just accused the city of being less "green".

Local resident Julie Hogg was one of those who though she had seen a change in the city.

"In three short years I've seen the attitude toward sustainability and green things in Alpharetta really change," she said.

When pressed by Councilman Aiken on what specifically caused her to make that claim, she referred to the planned removal of specimen trees for a new City Hall and a parking garage.

"Really all this plan is doing is expanding the heat island," Hogg said.

Councilman Michael Cross later responded, saying the city was removing one parking lot and replacing it with a town green, an example of removing a heat island.

David Cox told council that building City Hall where it's now planned will require removing three large water oak trees. He also said work already done at the Brooke Street Park site has damaged trees, with heavy equipment running over critical root zones. He asked for the city arborist to inspect all of the trees on the City Center site.

Brian Patton said didn't understand why people were saying the city was rushing into the plans. Patton said that in 2003 when he was on the Community Development staff, he developed the first concept plan for a City Center. Since that time three City Center plans have been developed, with two public-private partnerships being approved.

Downtown property owner Art Trotter was in favor of the plan, and asked the city to keep moving forward.

Alpharetta Mayor David Belle Isle promised city residents answers to questions about the City Center project he didn't have at hand during Monday night's City Council meeting.

 

No Name August 07, 2012 at 10:35 PM
It is true what you reported about the wording of the bond referendum ballot measure. But maybe what is more important is what was OMITTED from the discussion. The bond ordinance states: Any brochures, listings or other advertisements issued by the City of Alpharetta or by any other person, firm, corporation or association with the knowledge and consent of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Alpharetta, Georgia *shall* be deemed to be a *statement of intention* of the City of Alpharetta concerning the use of the proceeds of the bonds. The mailers show the old drawings with the City Hall positioned on the west side of existing Haynes Bridge Road. This mailer was from the Bond Referendum team and has a quote by former mayor Arthur Letchas so it is assumed that this mailer went out with the City's knowledge.
Travis Allen August 08, 2012 at 10:36 AM
A very good point indeed... Did Chris Owens not know this, or was he trying to skirt around the issue?
No Name August 08, 2012 at 02:10 PM
Draw your own conclusions.
Bob Pepalis (Editor) August 08, 2012 at 03:41 PM
Since the city is not allowed to lobby for a bond referendum once it's approved for placement on the ballot, they can't give official consent to those kinds of advertisements. Whether they knew about them in advance is another matter. Basing your assumption on use of a quote is flimsy evidence at best. I use quotes from mayors and City Council members all the time and they never see my work in advance of posting it online. The bigger issue that I see is this: Did they know many voters believed they were voting for a specific plan, and did they try to make it clear that a specific plan wasn't tied to the vote?
Julie Hollingsworth Hogg August 08, 2012 at 08:14 PM
to that end read my blog today where I point out that Council has repeatedly stated that the first plan was "not set in stone" - exact quote.....however, when pressed by us to change the location or footprint of the parking deck they state, "That was in the original drawing that citizens voted on at the bond referendum. It's a done deal." ??????????

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »