Several weeks ago I emailed Rep. Jan Jones, co-sponsor of HR 1162, to ask her for her thoughts on education reform, why HR 1162 was needed and how the amendment would implement those needed reforms. I received a lengthy reply back for which I am grateful. The 4-page "Q & A" on HR 1162 and HB 797 is attached as a PDF. This is not new information, but worth a re-look since the big vote is right around the corner.
Since this is a blog and I'm supposed to brief, I will draw your attention to the second paragraph in which Rep. Jones states, "If challenged in court, the decision calls into question whether state government has any meaningful role in public education, except, perhaps, for putting a check in the mail." She is referring to the Georgia Supreme Courts decision in May 2011 which ruled that the previous Charter School Commission was unconstitutional.
Rep. Jones is implying that the state may have no authority if this endless litigation continues – that would be kind of like taxation without representation (see next sentence in attachment) not for the actual taxpayer, I don't think, but for the General Assembly. That's why we need to vote for HR 1162. Wow – did we always have to consult our attorneys before voting on a simple amendment??
So how does this statement rate on truthfulness? Here's what I could find about the states current constitutional authority;
State Board of Education - the constitutional authority which defines education policy for the public K-12 education agencies. There are currently 146 State Education Rules (see GaDOE website) on the books. Sounds like a lot of authority to me.
General Assembly - last I knew they wrote and passed our laws. They also have the authority to determine the AMOUNT of the check they put in the mail to local school systems. Sadly, despite the fact that the state funding amount is supposed to be determined by the QBE formula, the General Assembly has decided to short their lawful mandate by $5 billion since 2003 (also on the GaDOE website – see Dr. Barge's fact sheet).
So...was the constitutional authority of the state in its entirety put into jeopardy by the Supreme Court's decision? I don't think so and will hereby give Rep. Jones statement a HIGH DRAMA reading on truthfulness. Not appropriate to call someone I don't really know a liar!
In addition, Rep. Jones answered my question - how will HR 1162/HB 797 address the areas of education reform you feel are important? The answer; "Public charter schools are one tool to help address the different preferences and needs of families and students all across Georgia...Many reforms, including merit pay, utilizing online technology and offering more educational options help address challenges in public education that cannot be solved through more-of-the-same." So there you have it.
Rep. Jones statement is 100% consistent with the language in HB 797 - lines 21 and 22; State charter schools do not supplant public schools operated by local boards of education but provide options to enhance public educational opportunities (my bold). This amendment and the enabling legislation doesn't even pretend to address failing schools or at-risk students.
The photo shown is of my son with the first and short lived Fulton County Honor Band when he was in 5th grade. In March 2010, Fulton County cut the elementary band program to help fill the gap in a looming $120 million deficit. Isn't elementary school band an enhancement that would benefit thousands of public school kids? Shouldn't the General Assembly be working with the local school boards to ensure that ALL Georgia students have enhanced educational opportunites?
Reason # 3 to Vote "NO" on Hr 1162 - the state (and here I really mean the General Assembly - Dr. Barge has made it pretty clear that he is not in favor of this amendment) has not lived up to it's current constitutional mandate, don't let them expand it!
As a parent, I am appalled by certain legislators portrayal of themselves as some sort of squad of white knights coming to rescue public education from the "educrats." In my opinion, everyone who voted for HR 1162 is part of "the problem" which they refuse to clearly define as evidenced by the nebulous language in HB 797. I find their rhetoric and constant deflection of responsibility despicable.
Want to connect with a grassroots organization which is NOT a front for the Walton Family Foundation? Check out EmpowerEDga, http://empoweredga.org/ – it's free to join and full of useful facts and information.
Holly J
5:34 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
This entire debate is being hijacked in order to obscure the real intent of the amendment and the Legislature- which is to dismantle public education as we know it in the name of "reform." The choice before us in November is NOT about whether or not to have charter schools. We have them; we will continue to have them;they can serve a purpose, when used appropriately. It IS about who controls the process and, thus, the money. This must be repeated over and over again, because the language of the amendment itself is misleading, not to mention the red herrings being thrown out by Jones, Rogers, Deal, Lindsey, et al.
Notice that the loudest voices calling for "reform" are NOT the classroom teachers, who would know best what reforms will and won't work. It's politicians who don't even have children in the public schools. Classroom teachers are begging for reforms, but not what the Legislature is forcing on them. Because the reforms that will work for ALL schools throughout the state don't line the pockets of the legislators--reforms like giving teachers the power to truly enforce discipline in their classrooms, releasing them from unfunded mandates and too many high stakes tests that do nothing to improve learning, smaller class sizes. Oh wait, those are all things that charter schools trumpet as their selling points. Well, if it's good enough for charters, then it ought to be good enough for ALL SCHOOLS. Why,then, aren't we doing it in all schools. Hmm???
Elizabeth Hooper
7:21 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
Thanks for weighing in Holly. Did you happen to see Chip's piece in the AJC Sunday? He has the nerve trot out the meaningless SAT scores once again. He then proceeds to declare that if all children attended public charter schools the savings would be 2 billion annually. The man has no shame for lying to every taxpayer and voter in the state. I wonder, who should we trust, Chip Rogers aka Will the Winner, who does not send his children to public school or Dr. Barge who is an educational professional? Georgia's children deserve better than every single ALEC initiated bill Chip Rogers has attempted to push through the legislature. Hope at least the AJC will subject his pathetic attempt at "public policy" propaganda to their truth-o-meter.
Holly J
6:32 am on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
I did see his op-ed piece. I keep waiting for the voters of Cherokee County (and now, a sliver of North Fulton) to wake up and really listen to what he says. So far I have been disappointed. Thank you for your well-written pieces- I hope the voters take the time to really understand this issue and not get caught up in the rhetoric.
Athens Mama
7:47 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
Federal legislation is always going to trump true reform in local school districts - because the feds have an unlimited amount of money behind their checks. So students with Special Education needs will continue to receive unlimited funds. Gen ed. students will continue to get the short end of the stick because they are now the newest "underserved" population. Local school districts are unlikely to approve any new charter schools - because they are already struggling to maintain the machines on the roster with less and less money to spend. Therefore, if the machine in your neighborhood school district is broken, and you own property, and you work - then you are out of luck for getting your child a quality education unless you can afford private school. I for one, do not accept that for my child - who is the heartbeat of my life. Luckily, I was able to fix my own family's problem, but for many - they are S - T - U - C - K. I will vote for any initiative that promotes CHOICES that would pressure poor administration and some burnt out teachers to start improving their quality of service. Again, local school admins and boards' hands are tied when it comes to weeding out burnt out teachers. Unions protect teachers once they are tenured, and if you are a tenured teacher, you are going to have to do something like strike a child in order to get fired. So, weeding the bad apples that poison our systems isn't an option.....Charter Schools........Choices.....Choices....
Steely Dan
10:16 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
This entire debate is being hijacked so that local school boards can deny charter schools in the near future and steer funding back to the traditional public schools (TPS) This entire debate is being hijacked because TPS admins and educators hate competition as much as they love tenure. The same excuses are always made for mediocrity yet the same people running our educational system never change a thing. Why is that?
As usual with the traditional public schooling side of the debate, the focus is on money, rather than the education of our children. An education that many, MANY TPS aren't providing to even our HS graduates...25% of whom must take remedial classes during their freshman years of college.
I'll vote for anything that provides more alternatives for parents. Active parents of ignored students should not be forced back into the same failing TPS that they bailed from in the first place. This is esp. damaging to poor & minority students. A vote against 1162 is a vote for More Minority Oppression. A vote against 1162 is an endorsement of a failed Educational System that has dropped America to the 30s in the world's rankings. A vote against 1162 is a vote against parental choice and a vote for local crony-filled boards dictacting the lack of choice your child shall have.
After the left dismantles the competition that charters provide, what's next - teacher unions?
Thomas Hart
10:38 am on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Steely Dan,
I do not advocate dismantling TPS’s. Within the system are some great teachers and administrators that could lead the way in producing college/career ready students. They are fettered and muted by bloc politics, excessive mandates, and perceived threats to their careers. The voting booth can be a liberating experience for these people.
The presence of public charter schools will bring contrast and choice into the public school arena. I want high performing charter schools to move TPS administrators from making excuses to producing results. By the same token I want high performing TPS’s to keep charter schools focused and accountable to the parents.
I am afraid your concern about teacher unions is not an idle thought. I have asked many of the anti-choice advocates on the patch why the Georgia Association of Educators has a Collective Bargaining Committee. No one has yet explained how this prioritizes the children.
Holly J
11:42 am on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
I can't explain the collective bargaining committee, since teachers in GA are NOT unionized, and therefore not able to use collective bargaining. And I've been on the GAE website and cannot find any mention of this committee, so if you have a link to that information, please share it. So, let's put a moratorium on the terms "teacher unions " (as it pertains to GA, where no such animal exists) and also on "anti-choice." I have not heard one person on either side of this issue say that no one deserves a choice. What I have heard is the constant demonization of TPS's and those who works their backsides off in them. Are there bad schools? Yep. Always will be, charters or no. A lot of that blame lies not in the county office or even the school administration's office, but at the feet of parents who don't care and kids who refuse to learn or allow others to learn by disrupting the class.
Is there room to improve our schools? Absolutely! But no one has demonstrated to me that spreading already thin resources even thinner by adding charter schools does anything to help the other kids. The kids in the charter MAY be in a better situation, but why are we not looking for REAL solutions to lift ALL schools up for ALL students? Do some people actually believe that teachers and administrators don't care about the kids they work with and don't want them to succeed? That is insulting to those of us who have been in the classroom and who still are.
Thomas Hart
12:33 pm on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Cut and paste "http://gae2.org/content.asp?CatId=395&ContentType=About GAE"
go to the drop down,
select Collective Bargaining,
Select Search
The Search Provides the following public commitee information:
- Collective Bargaining Listing
AMMONS, REBECCA rammons@appling.k12.ga.us
BOOKER, CHARLOTTE charlotte.booker@gae.org COLLECTIVE BARGAINING CMTE EX-OFFICIO
BUTLER, LOIS lbutler@worthschools.net
CHAPMAN, SID sid.chapman@gae.org COLLECTIVE BARGAINING CMTE EX-OFFICIO
GUSTAFSON, MARGARET mgustaf3@gmail.com
JACKSON, SONYA sonyatjackson@aol.com
KREMKAU, DAWN dkremkau@yahoo.com
MCCRAW, PHALICIA seyana@aol.com
PATTERSON, NIKI niki.patterson@bartow.k12.ga.us
REESE, CYNTHIA cwallertennis@yahoo.com
ROLLINS, CALVINE calvine.rollins@gae.org COLLECTIVE BARGAINING CMTE EX-OFFICIO
ROSS, GORNATA gornataross@me.com COLLECTIVE BARGAINING COMMITTEE - CHAIR
Terry Tucker
12:49 pm on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
I will explain how collective bargaining works in Georgia:
GAE: Hi, can we have pay increases, smaller class sizes, fewer furlough days, and lower insurance rates?
GA Dept of ED: No.
GAE: OK, thanks anyway.
(works the same way at county level. There is a reason Cherokee has more furlough days than Cobb)
Thomas Hart
2:06 pm on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
The question is not if it works but why is it there?